Legal Opinion

At&t Wireless Pcs, Inc. v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 7, 2000No. 99-12261PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We vacate our previous opinion, AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 210 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir.2000), and dismiss this appeal because we lack jurisdiction.

Our previous opinion vacated the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion for summary judgment on its 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 claims. After issuing our opinion, it came to our attention that the district court never disposed of AT & T Wireless’s substantive due process claims. Hence, the district court’s judgment was not final. See Beluga Holding, Ltd. v. Commerce Capital Corp., 212 F.3d 1199, 1200 (11th Cir.2000) (“To be a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beluga Holding, Ltd. v. Commerce Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nextel Partners Inc. v. Kingston TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Verizon North, Inc. v. StrandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. Cellco Partnership v. Town of Grafton, Mass.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  5. Intermedia Communications, Inc. v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API