Kraycar v. Monahan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
It is well settled that a supplemental bill of particulars may be used for purposes of updating “claims of continuing special damages and disabilities” (CPLR 3043 [b]), but may not be used for adding new injuries or damages (see Kyong Hi Wohn v County of Suffolk, 237 AD2d 412 [1997]; Sagar v Khun Y. Son, 208 AD2d 1092 [1994]; Aversa v Taubes, 194 AD2d 580 [1993]; Mazzilli v City of New York, 154 AD2d 355, 356-357 [1989]). In *508this case, on the eve of trial, the plaintiff sought to add new injuries to the bill of particulars which had not been mentioned previously, and which did not appear in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mazzilli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Rey v. Park View Nursing Home, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Aversa v. TaubesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Lee v. Health Force, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Morton v. Brookhaven Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reed v. New York State Elec. & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Green v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Daly-Caffrey v. LicausiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Schreiber v. University of Rochester Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Solis-Vicuna v. NotiasNew York Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.