Legal Opinion

Susman v. Price

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 5, 1992No. 1-91-0675PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiff, Arthur T. Susman, claims an interest in the real property of defendants, Vern D. Price and Norma Price. Susman appeals under Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (134 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)) from an order finding that if his option to purchase the Prices’ property was enforceable, he was only entitled to 25% of the sale proceeds rather than 25% of the real estate itself. The order also allowed the Prices to sell their property to defendant, Joseph Sadacca. We consider whether the order appealed from was a final judgment as required under Rule 304(a). For the following reasons, we dismiss the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arachnid, Inc. v. BeallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Fleetwood Development Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Lunde v. Rockford Public Library BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris Bank Hinsdale, N.A. v. CaliendoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Coryell v. Village of La GrangeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Old Kent Bank v. StollerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Girsberger v. KreszAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Lozman v. PutnamAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API