Legal Opinion

Wareham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 2, 1996No. 96-1608, 96-1828PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

678 So.2d 432 (1996)

Francis X. WAREHAM, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 96-1608, 96-1828.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 2, 1996.

Rehearing Denied August 30, 1996.

Francis X. Wareham, Polk City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

GRIFFIN, Judge.

In these two cases, which we consolidate and consider together, defendant appeals the summary denial of his third and his fourth[1] Rule 3.800(a) motions to correct sentences he received for burglary, after violation of probation, and for manslaughter.

The trial court correctly ruled that these motions are frivolous…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Freeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API