Legal Opinion
Moore v. Gardner
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 17, 2006No. 05-3144-prPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff David C. Moore (“Moore”) appeals pro se from a judgment against him, *804entered after a jury verdict, in his action against various state defendants (“defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1985. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the issues on appeal and the procedural history.
Moore’s argues that he was prejudiced by Judge Siragusa’s failure to permit him sufficient opportunities to take discovery before trial. Moore asserts that no discovery was permitted in the case, and that as a result his trial was rendered “one sided and highly prejudicial.”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- McCarthy v. BronsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Wills v. Amerada Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- In Re Fitch, Inc., Appellant-Cross-Appellee, American Savings Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ubs Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Darnell Hicks v. Juan EncarnacionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Green v. LewalskiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- John Willis Richard v. Jennifer Dignean and Thomas TaneaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2026
- Romano v. C.O. OfficersDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020