Legal Opinion

Neuss, Hesslein & Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 6, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The defendant seeks to dismiss the petition on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine this suit, and that it does not allege sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action.

The action is one at law to.recover the sum of $3,626.45 with interest thereon, which sum was paid by the petitioner to various processors of cotton goods and which represented in part, the amount of processing taxes paid or payable by said processors tinder the Agricultural Adjustment Act on the processing of cotton goods sold by them to the petitioner.

Pursuant to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Cudahy Bros. v. La BuddeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson & Co., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Wilson & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API