Legal Opinion
State v. Norris
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 13, 2009No. 2 CA-CR 2006-0347PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Following a jury trial, appellant Anson Norris was convicted of second-degree burglary, a class three felony. After determining Norris had a prior felony conviction, the trial court enhanced his sentence under former A.R.S. § 13-604 1 and imposed a presumptive, 6.5-year prison term. See 2005 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch. 188, § 1. Norris argued on appeal that the trial court erred by finding his prior federal conviction qualified as a historical prior conviction pursuant to § 13-604. We affirmed his sentence without reaching the merits of his argument,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Edward CarranzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armando LOPEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Anthony Toliver, AKA T, United States of America v. Anthony Brian Patterson, AKA Brian Patterson, AKA Little AntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Arizona v. William Peter MoranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco InzunzaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. KimCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019