Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Port of New York Authority

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 24, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOHEY, District Judge.

This case involves the question whether Aetna’s lien as completing surety of a defaulting contractor has priority over tax liens of the United States against a fund of $67,000 held by the Port of New York Authority. The latter asserts no claim to the money which consists in part of retained percentages of payments certified as earned by the contractor for work done; and in part of the unpaid portion of a bonus concededly due but not paid to the contractor, for early substantial completion of the work called for by the contract.

The action was commenced in the New York…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. Embassy Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Triborough Bridge AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilmington Trust Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Randall v. ColbyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961
  3. United States v. McWilliamsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
  4. Fine Fashions, Inc. v. United States of America, and Linde Factors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Fine Fashions, Inc. v. United States of America, and Linde Factors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API