Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brunson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 8, 2001No. 3278Published

1DissentAnderson, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The result reached by the majority imposes an improper judicial limitation upon S.C.Code Ann. § 42-1-40 (1985 & Supp.1999) and the Full Commission. This decision threatens the right and duty of the Commission to factually analyze and apply the statute.

The procedural posture of this case reveals a decision by the Single Commissioner, affirmed in toto by the Full Commis*114sion, and validated by the Circuit Court. The only issue in this case is the interpretation and application of S.C.Code Ann. § 42-1-40 (1985 & Supp.1999):

“Average weekly wages” means the earnings of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foreman v. Jackson Minit Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. McCummings v. ANDERSON THEATRE CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. Boles v. Una Water DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Booth v. Midland Trane Heating & Air ConditioningCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API