Montana v. Crow Tribe of Indians
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
523 U.S. 696 (1998)
MONTANA et al.
v.
CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS et al.
No. 96-1829.
United States Supreme Court.
Argued February 24, 1998.
Decided May 18, 1998.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
2Opinion of the Court · GinsburgGinsburg, J.
J., and Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Souter, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which O'Connor, J., joined, post, p. 719.
Clay R. Smith, Solicitor of Montana, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, James E. Torske, Carter G. Phillips, Paul E. Kalb, and…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Ginsburg; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ash Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Crow Tribe of Indians v. State of Montana, and Ramon Dore, Director, Montana Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.