Legal Opinion

State v. . Hadley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Tbe defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging him with the crime of rape. There was. verdict of guilty of rape as charged in the bill, and judgment of death by asphyxiation. Defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court and was permitted to appeal in forma pauperis. The record and case on appeal were duly docketed in this Court, but defendant has filed no brief, which works an abandonment of the assignments of error (S. v. Hooker, 207 N. C., 648, 178 S. E., 75; S. v. Dingle, 209 N. C., 293, 183 S. E., 376; S. v. Robinson, 212 N. C., 536, 193 S. E., 701), except those…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . EdneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . DingleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. . HookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. State v. . KinyonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. . BriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API