Legal Opinion

Hocker v. Jamison

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1841PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Common Pleas of Montgomery county, in which Samuel Jamison brought two actions, one of assumpsit, the other an action of debt, against John Hocker and Dr George Martin, the plaintiffs in error, administrators, &c. of John Masterson deceased. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Huston, J.

These causes were tried together in the Common Pleas of Montgomery, and argued together here. The testimony was voluminous and contradictory. As we have not to decide on the merits or on the truth of the finding, I shall only state so much of the case as will be necessary to understand the points alleged, as they arise, and as we are called on to decide.

The first suit was on a promissory note, purporting to be made by John Masterson to Charles F. Redmond, as follows:

*439“ Plymouth, August 24, 1836.
“ Thirty days after date I promise to pay Charles…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magill v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1818
  2. Smith v. LaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1824
  3. Chess v. ChessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HinkleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  2. Chappell v. SpencerNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Brown v. StrawNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Sample v. CoulsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  5. Arnold, Barbour & Hartshorn v. JonesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1852

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API