Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Wood

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2013No. 2011AP1626-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the report filed by the referee, Kim M. Peterson, recommending the court suspend Attorney Everett E. Wood's license to practice law in Wisconsin for six months for 28 counts of professional misconduct. No appeal has been filed so we review the referee's report and recommendation pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).1 We approve and adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law. We agree that Attorney Wood's professional misconduct warrants a six-month suspension of his license to prac*281tice law, and we deem it appropriate to require Attorney Wood pay the full costs of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against TullyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Disciplinary Proceedings Against HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Everett E. WoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew H. MarxWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas J. McClureWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Diane R. CaspariWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew H. MarxWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API