Legal Opinion

Von Ehrensmann v. Lee

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1982No. 12854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

After preliminary negotiations, appellants and respondent entered into an oral agreement whereby appellants would purchase respondent’s residential property. On April 25, escrow instructions were executed by the parties, reflecting the agreement and stating the requirement that appellants must “place the escrow in a condition to close within 60 days” of the execution date of the escrow instructions. The instructions did not state a date for possession of the property.

On May 1, respondent prepared a memorandum which memorialized the terms of the oral agreement. Both appellants and…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Las Vegas v. Cragin Industries, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sun Realty v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1975

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rowland v. LepireNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pardee Homes of Nev. v. WolframNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Lowden Investment Co. v. General Electric Credit Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Clark County School District v. Rolling Plains Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Lubritz v. Circus Circus Hotels, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API