Legal Opinion

Bostwick v. Losey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Branch. (Pealer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts-are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff rented to the defendants, Losey and Burton, for a period of five years from and after January 1, 1880, a certain saw-mill in Union City at the rate of $500 per year. If the average of the logs in the mill-yard did not reach 800,000 feet each year, then the rent was to diminish as the $500 was to 300,000 (for example, if there were 200,000 feet only, the rent was to be $333.33j. Plaintiff agreed to—

“New roof the mill, and repair the flume, when necessary,, doing the work expeditiously, so as to not interfere with the running of the mill longer than was necessary.”

He was also—

*555“ To…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. . BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Hinckley v. BeckwithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Tyler v. DisbrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Piper v. FletcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Grennan v. Murray-Miller Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Lynder v. SS Kresge CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Pinching v. WurdemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  5. Vincent v. Central City Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API