Legal Opinion

Boyce v. City Hall for Springfield Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 11, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00181Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON RAMON BOYCE, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:19-cv-181 vs. CITY HALL FOR SPRINGFIELD, OHIO, et al., District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT: (1) THIS CASE PROCEED ON THE FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS OF RAMON BOYCE AND QUIANA BOYCE AGAINST DEFENDANTS PEABODY AND FADER ONLY; (2) ALL OTHER CLAIMS ASSERTED IN THE COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED; (3) PLAINTIFFS TERRELL AND COOK BE…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API