Boyd v. Huffine
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Gallatin County; W. R. C. Stewart, Judge. Action by Gertrude Boyd and another, against Roger Huffine ■and others to have determined the respective rights of the parties to the use of certain waters. From the decree and an order denying their motion for a new trial the defendants other than Hnffine have appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly
This action was brought to have determined the rights of plaintiffs and defendants to the use of the water flowing in Reynolds creek, in Gallatin county, and to adjust the relative priorities and amounts of their respective appropriations. The stream has its source in section 16 of township 2 north, of range S east, and flows in a southwesterly direction through sections 17, 20 and 19 of this township, and sections 24 and 23 of township 2 north, of range 4 east, and empties into Dry creek which flows down from the north and east through section 23. The lands of the plaintiffs lie in sections…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Pope v. AlexanderMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Norman v. CorbleyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by10 opinions
- Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Sanger v. HuguenelMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Wright v. BrooksMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Bosanatz v. OstronichMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- O'Malley v. O'MalleyMontana Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.