Legal Opinion
Layman v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 21, 2001No. 2D00-4728PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
787 So.2d 44 (2001)
Shamus D. LAYMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-4728.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
February 21, 2001.
PATTERSON, Chief Judge.
Shamus Layman appeals from the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for Layman to receive prison credit for time previously served.
Layman originally entered a nolo contendere plea to burglary, grand theft, and possession of burglary tools. On July 31, 1998, the trial court imposed a concurrent sentence of two years…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Singletary v. SlaySupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Steele v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Griffith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Burnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by11 opinions
- Swain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Haines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Petscher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Atkinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.