Legal Opinion

Haney v. Clark

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR to the district court for Dane County. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMilleb, J.

This suit was commenced by 8atterlee OlarJc and Henry Jones against Berry Haney, before a justice of the peace, where, in the absence of the defendant, on the return day of the writ, judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs ; from which the defendant appealed to the district court for Dane county, where he moved the court for leave to file his set-off to the plaintiffs’ demand, which was denied, and this is the error assigned.

The counsel for the defendant below, and plaintiff in error, neglected to have his motion with his proposed set-off embodied in a bill of exceptions ; and contented…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lessor of Fisher v. CockerellSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Gratz v. GratzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  3. People v. DaltonNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  4. Cole v. DriskellIndiana Supreme Court · 1818
  5. Blackford v. PeltierIndiana Supreme Court · 1819

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marathon Finance Corp. v. Rice Lake Auto Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API