DiVincenzo v. Tripart Development, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiffs’ motion seeking partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) against defendants, Tripart Development, Inc. (Tripart), Siltone Building Company, Inc. (Siltone) and Daniel Reimherr, individually and doing business as Doctor Carpentry.
On September 28, 1995, Reimherr and Joseph A. DiVincenzo (plaintiff) were injured when scaffolding constructed by them collapsed. Siltone was the general contractor, and Tripart was the owner of the property. Siltone hired…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Felker v. Corning Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Weininger v. Hagedorn & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Chapel v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cunningham v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. Manitou Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Sergeant v. Murphy Family TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Knauer v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Niethe v. PalomboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Oaks v. Pioneer Development Co. LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.