Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Erhardt

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 1, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover duties alleged to have been illegally exacted by the defendant, as collector of the port of New York, upon certain importations made by the plaintiff in the year 1889, consisting of cane heads, paper cutters, glove-hoolc handles, paper weights, etc., composed, some of rock crystal, seme of agate, and others of onyx. The articles were classified by the collector and subjected to duty under that provision of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, prescribing that there should be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of “all articles…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hahn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  2. United States v. M. Rice & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Rice & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  4. United States v. Dearberg Bros.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
  5. Erhardt v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API