Legal Opinion

Indymac Federal Bank FSB v. Quattrochi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 10, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

*764The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant Emigrant Bank (hereinafter the appellant), pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) and (4), inter alia, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale entered upon its default in answering the complaint. As to that branch of the appellant’s motion which was to vacate its default pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (4) for lack of jurisdiction, the affidavit of the plaintiffs process server constituted prima facie evidence of proper service pursuant to CPLR 311 (a) (1) (see C&H Import & Export, Inc. v MNA Global, Inc., 79 AD3d 784, 785 [2010]; SFR…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Skyline Agency, Inc. v. Ambrose Coppotelli, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Scarano v. ScaranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Stephan B. Gleich & Associates v. GritsipisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Simonds v. GrobmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API