Merchants' National Bank v. Goodman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Court of Common Pleas No. 1, of Philadelphia emntpt Of July Term 1884, No. 151. Assumpsit, by Samuel Goodman, W. E. Goodman and Joseph Goodman trading as Harrington & Goodman, against the Merchants’ National Bank. ■ The following case stated was agreed upon by the parties:— On the thirtieth (lay of October, 1888, the defendants in error opened an account as depositors with tho plaintiff in error, and they then received from the plaintiff in error a bank book,…
Read the full summary
Error to the Court of Common Pleas No. 1, of Philadelphia emntpt Of July Term 1884, No. 151. Assumpsit, by Samuel Goodman, W. E. Goodman and Joseph Goodman trading as Harrington & Goodman, against the Merchants’ National Bank. ■ The following case stated was agreed upon by the parties:— On the thirtieth (lay of October, 1888, the defendants in error opened an account as depositors with tho plaintiff in error, and they then received from the plaintiff in error a bank book, upon the first page of which was printed the following notice:— Notice. “In conformity with the rules adopted by all the…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sterrett
For reasons fully and clearly expressed in the opinion of the learned president of the Common Pleas, we are satisfied the judgment of that court in the case stated is correct.
Judgment affirmed.
Chief Justice Mercur dissented.
2Cited by23 opinions
- Winchester Milling Co. v. Bank of WinchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Fifth N. Bank v. AshworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Farmers National Bank v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Kershaw v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Minneapolis Sash & Door Co. v. Metropolitan BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.