Legal Opinion
In Re: Donald Grodsky
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 13, 2020No. 2:19-cv-14801Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: DONALD H GRODSKY CIVIL ACTION No. 19-14801 SECTION I ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a joint motion1 by Gordon, Arata, Montgomery, Barnett, McCollam, Duplantis & Eagan, LLC (“Gordon Arata”) and Seale & Ross to dismiss John L. Howell’s (“Howell”) appeal of the United States Bankruptcy Court’s order allowing attorneys’ fees and costs, or, alternatively, to affirm the bankruptcy court’s order. For the following reasons, the motion is granted and Howell’s appeal is dismissed. I. This appeal is the latest action in a series of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- In the Matter of Bobby Cahill, Janice Cahill, Debtors. Walker & Patterson, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- CRG Partners Group, LLC v. Neary (In Re Pilgrim's Pride Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Harolyn Anderson, Debtor. Richard M. Anderson, Cross-Appellee v. Harolyn Anderson, Cross-Appellant, and John F. Bufe, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.