Legal Opinion

Eastern Tar Products Corp. v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 6, 1959No. Civ. No. 10306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

The government has moved to dismiss, on grounds of res judicata and estoppel, this action to recover $6,903.07 out of $8,000 paid in compromise settlement of *111the government’s tax claim filed in a state court proceeding brought under the Maryland Sales in Bulk Act. Ann.Code of Md., 1957 ed., Art. 83, § 97 et seq.

That proceeding had been instituted in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City on February 17, 1953, by the purchaser of the Baltimore plant of Eastern Tar Products Corp. The court had entered an order appointing Irving B. Grandberg receiver “with the power and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fetting v. FlaniganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. National Marine Bank v. Heller, Hirsh & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  3. United States v. PateDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1942
  4. Aviation Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eastern Tar Products Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API