Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Pierce & Brown Buick Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1940Published

1Dissent

Close, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to affirm the order. Subdivision 2 of section 1458 of the Civil Practice Act is applicable to the facts here. It provides that upon a motion for a stay the moving party may put in issue the reason for its failure to comply with the arbitration agreement or to submit thereto. This subdivision further provides that unless the issue is raised by a motion to stay the arbitration, “ he [i. e., the party entitled to move] shall thereafter be barred from putting in issue the making of the contract or submission or the failure to comply therewith.” This…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. McCargo v. . JergensNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Ice Service Co. v. Phipps EstatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Banta v. BantaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API