United States v. Ramon Pinero, Teddy Suarez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendants-appellants, Teddy Manuel Suarez and Ramon Pinero seek reversal of their convictions for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy to do the same, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 1 arguing for the first time on appeal that the jury which decided their fate was never sworn in and that, therefore, the guilty verdict rendered by the jury was a nullity. 2 For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.
The court record reveals that the jury was selected and impaneled on January 30, 1990. The jury was not, however, sworn in on that day.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Donald L. Martin and Judy S. WeemsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Brass & Copper Workers Federal Labor Union No. 19,322 v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. MayfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- United States v. TurriettaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.