Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Care & Treatment of Van Orden

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 16, 2008No. SC 89224, SC 89408Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

I respectfully dissent. In In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970), the United States Supreme Court determined that the gradual transition of juvenile delinquency proceedings into a process that was tantamount to a traditional criminal proceeding warranted the application of criminal due process safeguards in juvenile courts. Id. at 365-366, 90 S.Ct. 1068. The same transition that occurred in juvenile delinquency proceedings now has occurred in Missouri’s SVP law. Regardless of the state’s characterization of the SVP law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. In Re the Care & Treatment of SpencerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Care and Treatment of Cokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. In Re the Care & Treatment of CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API