Legal Opinion

Potter v. Davidson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1933Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing denied. May 9, 1933

On Petition eor Rehearing

(21 P. (2d) 785)

KELLY, J.

Plaintiff accompanies his motion for rehearing with a brief indicating the following points: (1) That the defense of infancy is personal to the minor; (2) that plaintiff performed the work in question at the instance of Paul M. Shearer, as owner; (3) that by reason of plaintiff’s disaffirmance the contract under which plaintiff did said work became void ab initio, and, therefore, the rights of the parties are to be determined as if said contract had never been made; and (4) that the foreclosure of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Potter v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API