Legal Opinion

Jones v. Methvin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1941No. 13861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

We must first dispose of the question whether or not the plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law, the point being made by demurrer that mandamus was the proper remedy. It is argued that since mandamus is intended to compel action, and injunction to restrain or prevent it, this ground of the demurrer is good, since, as claimed, the plaintiff seeks only to compel the commissioner to observe in his official capacity the previous designation of the plaintiff’s newspaper as the official organ. It is contended that the plaintiff might obtain adequate relief by the writ of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Worth County v. Crisp CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Coffee v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Dollar v. WindSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Mayor of Danville v. Wilkinson CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Wilkinson County v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christian v. MorelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Scarbrough v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API