Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Drainage Commissioners of Union District No. 1

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 10, 1938No. Gen. No. 9,286Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfe

George K. Richmond, plaintiff appellee in this suit, brought this action against the Drainage Commissioners of Union District No. 1, in Hume and Prophetstown Townships in the county of Whiteside, Illinois, to compel the defendant to construct a bridge across a ditch running through the plaintiff’s farm, and if sufficient funds are not on hand, to levy a tax for that purpose.

In his petition for mandamus the plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s ditch runs through an inclosed field or parcel of land on plaintiff’s farm; that under the law the defendant is required to build and maintain a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. People ex rel. GrimwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People ex rel. Wies v. BowmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Heffner v. Cass & Morgan CountiesIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Gasaway v. North Branch Lake Fork Special Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hunt Drainage District v. HarnessIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API