Legal Opinion

Linick v. Lamm

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1962No. 62-75Published

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, TILLMAN, Chief Judge.

We have been presented with a motion by appellant to strike a condition in a supersedeas bond. The appeal is from a final decree for plaintiff in a chattel mortgage foreclosure. The appellant-movant was not the mortgagor but contests the lien of the mortgage.

The order granting supersedeas and fixing terms and conditions of the bond provides that the bond should be “ * * * conditioned to pay all costs and damages, including attorney’s fee.” A trial court is without authority to require as a condition of a supersedeas bond that attorney’s fees be paid by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Larson v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Ritter v. R. C. BentleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API