Buckbee v. Aweco, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentKnoll, Judge
For the following reasons I respectfully disagree with the majority opinion, finding instead that United Gas was negligent and that Buckbee's fault did not bar his recovery.
The majority misfocuses its attention on the fact that United Gas was not the owner of the heater at the time of the explosion. In so doing, the majority overlooks the crucial fact that United Gas was the owner of the heater when it contracted with Watt and agreed to monitor the proper cleaning of the heater.
The initial inquiry in any determination of actionable negligence on the part of the defendant is whether any causal…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smolinski v. TaulliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Dorry v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Buckbee v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Soileau v. South Cent. Bell Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Dyson v. Gulf Modular Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.