Legal Opinion

Windfall Natural Gas, Mining & Oil Co. v. Roe

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1908No. 6,186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Tipton Circuit Court; J. F. Elliott, Judge. Suit by William W. Roe against the Windfall Natural Gas, Mining & Oil Company, and others. Prom a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtITadley, J.

This suit was instituted against appellants to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on a gas-well, including tubing and piping, in Tipton county. The amended complaint is in one paragraph, and avers that the appellant-company is incorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana for the purpose of exploring for natural gas and oil, laying pipes and mains for the transportation of the same, and obtaining leases and easements for said purpose; that said appellant contracted with Norman W. Gilchrist to drill a well on the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section ten, township twenty-two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coburn v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hopkins v. HudsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. McNamee v. RauckIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McCarty v. BurnetIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Munger v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deal v. PlassIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Windfall Natural Gas, Mining & Oil Co. v. RoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Potter v. ClineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Potter v. ClineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API