Legal Opinion
Dorsa v. National Amusements, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), entered June 12, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to strike its answer based upon its spoliation of evidence to the extent of precluding it from offering certain evidence at trial.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to strike the defendant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Padula v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Mylonas v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Foncette v. LA ExpressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Fielding v. Rachlin Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ortega v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006