Legal Opinion
Amoco Production Co. v. Aspen Group
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 2, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-B-2630PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant, the United States of America (the United States), moves to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1). The motion is adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid its resolution. Jurisdiction exists pursuant to this court’s inherent authority to enter orders “necessary or appropriate” in aid of its jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1651. For the reasons set forth below, I deny the United States’ motion to dismiss.
II. LEGAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Raccoon Recovery, LLC v. Navoi Mining and Metallurgical KombinatDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. McDonnellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Shelter Mutual Insurance v. GregoryDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
- CPS Electric, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. v. Sprint Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.