Wilson v. Bauman
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John A. Jameson, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholeield
The declaration contains hut the common counts. The claim of the plaintiffs, in general terms, is, that the defendant is indebted to them for services rendered, as architects, in the preparation of certain plans and diagrams of a building erected by the defendant. They claim that the work was done under a special contract, which, they were prevented from fully performing, on their part, by the wrongful act of the defendant.
The authorities cited by plaintiffs’ counsel certainly sustain .the position that, where one party is guilty of a failure to perform his part of a special agreement, which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lonergan v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Turner v. DawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Holmes v. StummelIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by14 opinions
- Decatur County v. Praytor, Howton & Wood Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- O'Laughlin v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Sweet v. LeachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
- Klaub v. VokounAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Stoneking v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.