Legal Opinion

Parham v. the State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 8, 2017No. A17A1663PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Charles Frank Parham guilty of two counts of theft by deception, and the trial court sentenced him as a recidivist under OCGA § 17-10-7 (a) and (c) based on his prior felony convictions. The trial court thereafter denied Parham’s motion for new trial, as amended. On appeal, Parham argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him under the general recidivist statute, OCGA § 17-10-7 (a) and (c), because only the more specific recidivist provision for theft-by-deception convictions, OCGA § 16-8-12 (a) (1) (D), applied in this case. Parham also argues that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. von Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Fults v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. Fair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Goldberg v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coleman Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  2. Mamadou Lamine Sambou v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  3. William Maurice Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API