Legal Opinion

People v. June

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for an extension of time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: The fact that a defendant waives his right to appeal as part of a negotiated plea agreement “does not foreclose appellate review in all situations” and is not “sufficient to divest the court of subject matter jurisdiction” (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 284). The failure to notify a defendant in writing pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a), even when the right to appeal has been waived, constitutes improper conduct (see, CPL 460.30 [1] [a]). Present—Green, J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FinsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. FINSTER, FRANCIS, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. FinsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016