Legal Opinion

Ferraro v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 2018No. 17-3456 (L)Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3456 (L) Ferraro v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Amnesty America v. Town of West HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. McBride v. BIC Consumer Products Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API