Legal Opinion

Steelman v. Weiskittel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 20, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (Wickes, J.), dismissing the bill of complaint so far as the property involved in this appeal was concerned.

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.

This case is one mainly involving the finding of facts, for the law that must govern its decision is entirely free from difficulty. It is not disputed that one W. J. Atkinson borrowed from the appellee, Anton Weiskittel, the sum of one thousand dollars, for which he gave his promissory note for eleven hundred dollars. At the same time the appellee took, as collateral to secure the payment of the indebtedness, three bonds of the Home Telephone and Telegraph Company, each bond being of the par value of one thousand dollars. This note was renewed on August the tenth, eighteen hundred and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maryland Fire Insurance v. DalrympleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. Broadview, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Furst v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Dudley A. Tyng & Co. v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API