Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lowary

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1975No. 496PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANDERINO, Justice.

The only issue involved in this appeal is whether a spring-activated hand gun which shoots small steel pellets (commonly called B-B-s), is a “firearm” within the meaning of Section 716 of the Penal Code, Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872,18 P.S. § 4716. The statute proscribes the pointing of “a gun, pistol or other firearm at any other person.” (Emphasis added.)

The Superior Court, being equally divided, affirmed appellant’s conviction for violation of Section 716. Commonwealth v. Lowary, 226 Pa.Super. 115, 313 A.2d 317 (1973). Judge Spaeth wrote an opinion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. LowarySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SchillingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. State v. BeaudetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. Kinnish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API