Legal Opinion

Lazor v. Board of Assessment Appeals

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 2009No. 2372 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge QUIGLEY.

Keith Lazor and Valeri Lazor (Lazors) appeal from the Trial Court’s November 17, 2008 Order, which denied the Lazors’ appeal from the determination of the Board of Assessment Appeals of Armstrong County (Board) that their mobile home is taxable as realty. We affirm.

The Lazors purchased a 2006 Canterbury mobile home, which was delivered in 2006 to a campground in Mosgrove, Rayburn Township. 1 The new mobile home sits on a lot that the Lazors have leased for approximately the last five years.

The current mobile home is thirty-five feet long and eleven feet wide…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lantz AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Kmart Corp. v. Washington County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Monroe County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. S.L. Allen and L.L. Allen, h&w v. Juniata County Board of Assessment Appeals v. Juniata County and Juniata County SDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API