Legal Opinion

Finney v. Zingale

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, McDowell County. Action by Mary Finney against James Zingale. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, Judge:

In tbe first of the two counts of the declaration, a couni for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff averred, among other things necessary to show the cause of action, that the defendant appeared before W. E. Stuart, Mayor of the city of Keystone, authorized by law to issue warrants in criminal eases, and falsely and maliciously and -without any reasonable and probable cause whatsover charged plaintiff “with some such offense as aiding and abetting one Nannie Spinello and Joe Zingale in lewd, lascivious and unlawful cohabitation or some other charge of a similar nature, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Davy-Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Roberts v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Turk v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Williamson v. Glen Alum Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Comisky v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riffe v. ArmstrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Vorholt v. VorholtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Van Hunter v. Beckley Newspapers Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. City of McMechen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Donnally v. Fairmont Brewing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API