Legal Opinion
Zurat v. Town of Stockport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Yesawich, Jr., J.
Respondent Town of Stockport has issued water bills to each real property owner within its Water District No. 3 which has facilities using water or capable of using water, including petitioners, from 1980 through 1987. In 1980 and again in 1981, petitioners successfully brought CPLR article 78 proceedings against the town to have the 1980 and 1982 billings annulled. Petitioners then ignored subsequent billings believing that they were void under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, but when in 1985 petitioners sought to have their 1985 water bill annulled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zurat v. Town Board, StockportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Corvetti v. Town of Lake PleasantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Palmieri v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Lawless v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991