Legal Opinion

Cook and Sons Equipment, Inc. v. Morris Killen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1960No. 16273PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

In the District Court of Alaska, an action was instituted wherein one Morris Killen was named as plaintiff and “Charles Cook and Charles Cook, Jr., d/b/a Cook & Sons Equipment Company, in the State of California” were named as defendants. It is apparent from the designation of the parties in the complaint that the pleader was under the impression that the defendants were operating a partnership. However it was later made manifest that Cook & Sons Equipment Company is a corporation.

The corporation appeared and answered, trial was had and judgment entered against the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas G. Jewett, Jr. Inc. v. Keystone Driller Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Miller v. SteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. United Const. Co. v. MilamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Pacific Finance & Investment Co. v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Penwell v. NewlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. James A. McShane v. United States of America, Scottish Law Society, English Law Society, Rhodesian Immigration AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Southwestern Media, Inc. v. Albert M. Rau and Henry JacobowitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Edmondson v. BlakeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Daniels v. GilbreathCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API