Legal Opinion

McQuay v. McQuay

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1928No. 6,212PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

By this action the plaintiff James McQuay sought to have his son, defendant Ray McQuay, declared a trustee of property of which plaintiff claimed to be the rightful owner.

The record discloses that in 1915 Kate Fogarty executed and delivered to plaintiff a grant deed conveying residence property in Butte for the sum of $950, paid by plaintiff. By express direction of plaintiff the name of the grantee was omitted from the deed, the plaintiff reserving the right to insert the name of a grantee therein when he should choose to do so. The reason for this was that plaintiff did not carry property…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Robinson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Clary v. FlemingMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Sanger v. HuguenelMontana Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Batchoff v. CraneyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lewis v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Platts v. PlattsMontana Supreme Court · 1959

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API