Swallow v. Swallow
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On petition to discharge a writ of sequestration.
1Opinion of the Court
Backes, V. C.
The final decree of divorce granted to the petitioner in 1905 made no provision for alimony. During the pendency of the suit, an order was made that the defendant pay to the petitioner the sum of $5 per week, until the further order of the court in the premises. The defendant defaulted. Recently he came into an inheritance, and a writ of sequestration issued, which was executed. The defendant now offers to pay the amount of alimony that accrued up to the time of the entry of the final decree, and prays that upon payment being made the writ be discharged. The petitioner insists on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Forrest v. . ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Forrest v. ForrestThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
- Wood v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bickle v. BickleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Lief v. LiefNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Poeter v. PoeterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Swallow v. SwallowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915