City of Orlando v. Cone
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COBB, Judge.
The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether, in a condemnation proceeding, it is proper to instruct a jury that a landowner’s opinion as to the value of his or her own property is presumed to be correct.
The condemnors herein sought to obtain certain properties for expansion of the Orlando International Airport. One such property, parcel 20, was a narrow five-acre tract owned by George and Betty Cone. During the jury trial in regard to parcel 20, three witnesses testified as to its value. The condemnor presented expert testimony of a certified appraiser that the parcel’s fair…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gulle v. BoggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERV. v. BonannoSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Leonetti v. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- City of Fort Lauderdale v. Casino Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Foster v. City of GainesvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.