Legal Opinion

In re the State of Farone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion granted, without costs, and the Otsego County Surrogate’s Court is authorized, pursuant to SCPA 2302 (6), to determine whether and in what amount petitioners should be allowed counsel fees (see, Matter of Hedrick, 52 AD2d 1035). Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of HedrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976